In some large cities, people have to pay a fee when they drive their cars into the city center, in a policy to reduce the number of cars in the city. Give reasons in support of and opposing this policy, and give your own idea.

In modern times, one of the major issues faced by developed cities is traffic congestion due to the staggering amount of machine users in the
city
areas. As a result, drivers are charged a fee before entering the
city
centre
in some countries. To my way of thinking, there are positive and negative effects that I’m in favour and against to be analysed for
this
policy. Undoubtedly,
this
strategy certainly comes with some positive impacts on the traffic.
First
of all,
such
action may insist the public to reduce the usage of machine unnecessarily. As a result, residents who are living in the
city
centre
don’t tend to be under severe pressure of noise and pollution as well as emission.
This
would be advantageous for the department of road and transport. What is more,
this
management will
also
bring several benefits for both economy and people’s health.
However
, to my mind, the detrimental sides of
this
police definitely outweigh the benefits.
Firstly
, requiring plenty of funds from drivers is abnormal. Extra pay for a car might be burdened for the people who used car as the transport for the up and down trips, especially for those whose jobs need them to be constantly travelling around the
city
. While rich drivers may be unaffected by
this
policy, those workers with an average amount of income would surely be troubled by the extra pay.
Secondly
, it can less affect the travellers and tourists. To illustrate, people may try to find out alternative passage ways to the
city
centre
which is non-payee and traffic congestion wouldn’t fall down vividly. In brief, the controversial issue of road payees for the car often helpful for the environment and people in the same manner.
However
, it seems to me that extra pay for cars to enter the
city
centre
to limit number of cars isn’t the best solution,
furthermore
this
is too extreme to be practiced.
Submitted by Райхон Мадреймова on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: