In many countries, people in big cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?

In

this

contemporary world, many developed cities have occupants either living by themselves or together in small numbers.In my opinion

,

Accept space

,

this

is a desirable state, and

this

essay will explain reasons why it is more preferable.

Firstly

,

Accept space

,

there isn't enough

space

in the urban areas.More individuals flood to the cities for jobs and education, that it gets over populated.If new residents arrive to metropolitan areas, the

city

dwellers have to compensate with the shrinking

space

available for them to be free in.That being said, if there was a big family, the

space

available in the cities residential area won't be enough.An example of

this

is seen in Mumbai, where a dozen relatives cram into a single room to sleep in. These pupils live in constant claustrophobia.

Secondly

, the cost of living in urban residential areas is exorbitant.If the person is struggling to take care of him/herself in the

city

, imagine the cost of a large family.

This

is evidenced by workers in Tokyo who live alone during the week in the

city

and return to their village on weekends to their whole family to save money. Living in solitary in an urban environment

also have

Suggestion

also has

lifestyle perks.The individual will not be limited by their family members on their activities during their leisure time.They can take full advantage of what the

city

has to offer.

For example

, they can go to the movies anytime they want without informing any significant others.

This

makes staying alone, more enjoyable. In conclusion, I firmly believe that living in small numbers or alone is beneficial over living in large groups because not only it saves

space

and money, but allows more freedom.