There are many people who go to live in different countries. To what extent should people be allowed to move freely between countries and live where they choose? What are the benefits and drawbacks of this? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

At the onset, increasingly people are moving to other nations, owing to both fantastic opportunities and preferable livelihood;

hence

Linking Words

, migration is inevitable.

Moreover

Linking Words

, freedom is a fundamental right of a citizen;

therefore

Linking Words

, they must be allowed to select the land they want to reside.

Besides

Linking Words

, at some place people earn their living merely because of tourism;

as a result

Linking Words

, it must be underpinned by the authorities. If the international movement becomes easy, the employment of tourist places will increase.

For instance

Linking Words

, according to The Times newspaper, Canada has eased the immigration laws to alleviate the threat of an unavoidable decline in the workforce.

Without any qualms, there are multitude pros and cons of

this

Linking Words

movement across the borders. Looking at upside, it enables different countries to increase their economy. Perennially, it enables a country to promote globalization, which is an imperative tool for the growth of the global economy. At the opposite end of the spectrum, it has proved to be a major setback to the developing nations, as their citizens are moving overseas in order to live amazing lives.

Consequently

Linking Words

, it is being considered as a workforce loss by some nations. What is more, sceptics have been arguing that migrants rip-off the rights of indigenous people. To illustrate, in the United States of America, there has been a great hue and cry to curtail the immigration as they believe that immigrants are bagging better opportunities.