some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as unemployed and homeless people . Do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that, the federal ministry of a country should support the poor and homeless because they have nowhere else to go, while others think that

this

investment should be utilized in developing the technology and business of the nation. Both the points have their own impact, but I agree with the prior. The fact that the ministry is elected predominantly by these poor and unemployed people to get aided in their life, obliges the authority to work towards them; they cannot be neglected.

This

is a foundational idea on which a ruling party is elected that all the citizens will get access to elementary necessities-food, shelter, clothes, work.

Moreover

, countries like Eutopia, where the people below poverty line covers over 45% of the total population, in

such

circumstances union should intend to take matters in their hands.

Furthermore

, if the unfortunate ones' are reprimanded from fundamental needs, it can trigger crimes

such

as - human, weapons and drug trafficking, theft, murder, etc., deteriorating the economy and functionality of the country; making it an obscene territory to survive in, and

this

can only be confined by employing people. To exemplify, The United States Of America is known to be in one of the topmost countries, primarily because of the fact that the lifestyle of the people is maintained to a higher degree, serving them more skilled jobs and boosting up the economy. The other aspect and drawback are

also

an area of consideration, that the fiscal space of a nation might recoil if most of the budget is spent on employment and shelter. Is

this

concern legit? And is there no way out of

this

? Well, if more people are employed intellectually, the state can make more money out of it and

this

can only boost up the finance;

besides if

Accept comma addition

besides, if

people get employed they can be capable enough to provide themselves shelter and food.

For instance

, in India, as the majority of the fertile land is left to no benefit because there are not enough farmers or resources to cultivate crops, the management can provide resources and use the land for production and export of food; attracting more income to the nation and building remunerative relationships with other countries.