Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, people remain divided over whether we should

study

history

. While some people believe that there isn’t anything to learn from the past, others argue that

history

is a valuable source of information for us. I side with the latter. On the one hand, I understand why people think it is unprofitable to

study

history

.

First

, most of the information which we learn from the past is not useful in daily life and the

future

. They are facts, dates, names, what happened in the past.

Second

, it is clear that most of the children in school don't interested in

history

. They believe that the past is just past and there isn't any reason for studying the past

instead

they focus on science or technology

that is

more relevant to their jobs in the

future

.

On the other hand

, I would argue that we should

study

history

. It is clear that there are much knowledge and experience that we could learn from the past.

As a result

, the same mistakes wouldn't be made again and again.

Moreover

, learn about the past often gives us a glimpse of the

future

. It helps us have better views of the present and the

future

.

Last

but not least,

history help

Accept comma addition

history, help

people understand deeper about their country, their culture, what their ancestor experienced and did in the past. They

also

learn about the cause and effect, so they would make the right choice in the

future

.

Hence

, I believe that people would be better because they

study

history

. In conclusion,

although

it has always been a controversial issue over whether people should

study

history

, I firmly believe that

history

plays an important role in people's education.