Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. (opinion) Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The modern era has undergone a mammoth change. There have been ongoing debates whether the labour hours should be

diminishing

Suggestion

diminished

or not. Some people opine that hours spent in the workplace must be redacted as the boom in technological and scientific advancement over the past decade has led to automation in industry, which has greatly diminished the need for manual labour. I completely agree with

this

notion and will discuss the plausible justifications discussed in following paragraphs. On the one side, the

first

and foremost, manifold points to shore up my point of view put forward that technological improvement has significant impact on the productivity and accuracy in the contemporary work;

hence

the need for physical workers decreases.

Therefore

, it is imperative that the hours which were clocked by employees be reduced as well, as every individual has the right to reap the rewards of science. To exemplify it, there is a paradigm of a bank cashier as

although

, in the pre computer era, they have to calculate all the transactions manually,

this

is no longer the case with the automation in the banking industry because cashier can now serve 4-5 customers within 15 minutes and

additionally

, at the end of the day, the calculation is done with the banking software. Undoubtedly, reducing the working

time

seems quite logical to me.

Secondly

, to

further

emphasize my prospective, reducing working hour could be lucrative for employees to balance between personal and professional life which in turn motivate the employees. To illustrate, people can spend quality

time

with the family at that free duration and can get break from monotonous routine which in turn enable them to do the same task continuously. As a consequence,

this

would not only enhance overall productivity, but

also

establish the healthy and productive work environment. On the flip side, few masses opine that reducing redundant

time

likely to affect incomes of employee. The most valid reason they give is that the owner of the business being more powerful, they get

unsaid right

Accept comma addition

unsaid, right

to decline in employee wages, which often disturb their budget, if a person’s working duration will decrease. Apart from

this

, it has been proved from ages that the relationship between the two is quite mutual. Rather than giving instruction,

employer

Suggestion

employers

an employer

the employer

can tactfully take

decision

Suggestion

a decision

on salaries based on the duty’s hours. To recapitulate, considering everything, I strongly believe that the

time

to complete the job should be trimmed out. The reason is that

although

staffs have multiple tasks, they are enabled to do more assignments per hour with the use of machinery advances. It would both help the organization to retail their better performing employees and motivate staff.