Developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In the modern era as an economy is a developing it is necessary to require a large amount of

money

. It is often argued that

nation

who already have strongest health should different sorts of offer

instead

of monetary fund. I certainly disagree with

this

notion because

money

is the essential key brought development for any region.

Further

information about

this

will be discussed in the essay.

To begin

with, a well set

nation

should give funds to backward ones. There are several reasons for

this

.

First

and foremost, if the economy gets the aid in the form of

money

they can spend in a sector where actually required. Which lead to boom a particular aspects of countries.

For example

, In 2003 USA built major School in Bhutan.

However

, Bhutan actually a lot requirement in medical as their health sector as very downward. So countries like Bhutan need of financial help

instead

of other aid.

Similarly

, a country gets

money

from another

nation

can

first

pay their debt and release burden of interest. As a consequence, their economy grows in an efficient manner.

For instance

, in 2016 India got the fever from the Japan amount of 1000

crore

. Which Indian used to pay their debt,

as a result

, a country grows rapidly and reported

8 % increase

Suggestion

a 8 % increase

in GDP in

next year

Suggestion

the next year

. To conclude, after musing both sides of the argument I believe that financial aid is the best way to encourage other

nation

. As other kind of help is not efficient and there are a several reasons to demonstrate that

this

is not the case.