Students should pay the full cost of their own study because university education benefits individual rather than society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that learners should be responsible for their entire tuition fees in higher education (from) where participants take advantage for themselves

instead

Linking Words

of bringing favourable outcomes for (individuals). In my point of view, I completely disagree with

this

Linking Words

idea. Discussed below are several reasons supporting my perspective. In the

first

Linking Words

place, I lean toward the idea that providing funding for education in college which not only (might) open more opportunities for graduates to pursue a successful career, but

also

Linking Words

(could) contribute to the process of (developing the economy). Undeniably, the economy is becoming increasingly knowledge-based

,

Accept space

,

and most repetitive manual jobs are now done by machines.

Hence

Linking Words

, to meet the demand of the inexorable vigorous development of the modern economy, encouraging students (enrolling) universities to acquire specific knowledge and skills by cutting part of learning fees is essential. Another convincing point is that charging the whole cost of the study in (higher academic) institutions is a huge burden for the enrollees. They might be forced to pay off a heavy student loan or work their way through (the) universities. In the latter case, their study would suffer, and some might fall behind with their studies or even drop out of college. To (

this

Linking Words

) end

this

Linking Words

problem, numerous higher education organizations willingly offer alluring scholarships (for) their students share part of the university fee. In conclusion, it seems to me that the national authorities could obtain benefits for economic files from sponsoring graduates (part of) study expenditure(s), and paying the full cost of learning in college might take a heavy toll on the learners.