In the future, nobody will buy printed books and newspapers because they will be able to read everything online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It is widely believed that there might be a sharp decrease in the number of readers of printed materials as it requires more money and a physical demand to purchase them constantly.

Hence

, many prefer to acquire knowledge and catch the news as a gadget user owing to the fact that it costs less and enables its users to get everything quickly.

However

, it seems to me that

this

tremendous change that cutting-edge technology is providing,

can not

can not

cannot

replace the value of reading paper books, since no one can deny the harmful effect of monitor screen as well as

unreliability

Suggestion

the unreliability

of internet data. And

this

following essay will be covered with my radical

approach mentioning

Accept comma addition

approach, mentioning

several reasons why traditional way of getting knowledge will not lose its importance among individuals. To embark on, Even though technology has provided better facilitated ways of reading materials,

such

as financial preference and the pace of finding information, no one can deny the harmful impact of radioactive screen on the health of gadget users and

this

health

factor

should be the most prioritized aspect of life rather than finance. What I mean is that sacrificing the well being of a human for the sake of cheaper activities might be paid off in the

future which

Accept comma addition

future, which

can result in the investment of too much money

on

Suggestion

in

the process of recovering unless it is tackled in time. Turning to the another

factor

to justify my position could be that despite the countless advantages of digital items, yet it stays the source which can not be relied completely due to the fact that in the global village subjectivity of internet users is dominant and

this

is the

factor

that fills

this

particular village with excessive amount of wrong dogmas.

Therefore

, if one wills not to be trapped by fake illusive knowledge, there should be a bit restriction to follow

digitalized

put into digital form, as for use in a computer

digitalised

source of information. To sum up,

although

technology has provided a radical approach to all human activities, particularly reading papers in an economic way, I believe that

this

significant

factor

can not outbalance the views of those who claim to prioritize the health of individuals more than anything.

Moreover

, the usage of reliable sources is regarded vitally, in the meantime the internet consists of mainly misleading materials by which anyone may get trapped.