Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued by several people that the industries, and the public need to bear the compensation equal to the volume of

waste

produced by them, in order to decontaminate the surroundings. I completely agree with

this

statement because it can aid to control the

pollution

level and the recycling process.

This

essay will discuss the above- mentioned benefits in detail with a reasonable example.

Firstly

, the decomposition of the

waste

generated is essential, and requires a huge amount of funding.

In other words

, when the factories and the public will have to make up for the amount of

pollution

created by them,

then

the disposal or cleanup will become affordable and easy for the government.

Furthermore

, the money received as the compensation can be utilised to recycle the unwanted things. To exemplify, according to a report published in 2018 by The Hindu newspaper, in India, various States lack the money needed to dispose of the enormous quantity of garbage collected every week.

Secondly

, the people may become more responsible, and eventually less

waste

will be produced by them.

This

is to say that, in order to minimise the expenses to pay for the

pollution

generated by the public, their tendency will be higher to reduce the contamination to the environment caused by them.

For instance

, in 2016 in Solan, India, the people were made to pay for the garbage produced by them for its disposal, which resulted in a decline in the quantity of

waste

created in the area.

Hence

, a sense of responsibility was achieved through it. To conclude, the capital obtained from the factories and the citizens of a country, to clean the polluted surroundings will be useful in various ways.

Moreover

, it can decrease the level of

pollution

, and will provide the funds necessary for the decomposition of the

waste

.