Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that developed countries should consider accepting additional asylum seekers by providing them with the elementary requirements like food and shelter. I completely agree with

this

thought due to the humanitarian concern associated with it and the capability of

first

-

world

countries compared to

third

-

world

countries. Refugees are increasing day by day,

as a result

of political tensions across the borders. The Suffering of those people is unimaginable to the outside

world

. When many individuals come across the rare pictures which depicts the pain in those affected people, there is a thought of humanity which arises. So, on the grounds of humanity, I believe that developed countries should take in more refugees giving them basic necessities, which other words would be impossible for them to conceive.

Moreover

,

first

world

countries already have a well- organized administration system which makes them capable of receiving more refugees to their country without affecting their system. Apart from that, these countries are wealthier and can support the refugees with their basic necessities. At the moment many

first

world

countries like Australia and U.S.A welcome refuges. It is comparatively less burdensome on these countries to accommodate asylum seekers.

Nevertheless

, opponents claim that welcoming asylum seekers can increase the crime rates in their country.

However

, if there is a well-developed law and regulation, the chances of

such

issues are negligible or can be completely controlled. In conclusion, developed countries should take in extra refuges as the numbers are drastically increasing. The strength of

first

world

countries allows them to accept them and respecting humanity, I strongly agree that developed countries should take the hold.