Nuclear energy is the better choice for meeting increasing demand. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

Most people declared that nuclear

energy

is a more superior alternative of

energy

to deal with higher

demand

. Nuclear

power

, one of the most significant solution for

energy

scarcity, yet it is disagreeable for developing

this

mean

Suggestion

meaning

of

power

since it is still for military uses in today’s world. On the one hand, there are two main reasons why nuclear

energy

should be particularly limited.

First

, nuclear

power

is mostly applied for national military, especially in many superpowers,

such

as United States, Russia, or China. It is archived that many military’ superpowers

have been launching

Suggestion

have launched

at least hundreds of nuclear weapons since mid-20th century. Worldwide’ superpowers today are racing to scramble the rank of

strongest weapon system

Suggestion

the strongest weapon system

. Whenever the race becomes escalating, the nuclear war could occur unexpectedly, followed by

instant ending

Suggestion

the instant ending

of humanity on Earth.

Second

, nuclear

power

for military uses can

also

affect Earth’s biodiversity and climate. It is researched that nuclear wars can lead to lifelong climate issues, with lower global temperatures, ozone depletion and

also

species extinction.

On the other hand

, if nuclear

power

is accurately used and only for solving the

demand

of

energy

, it could provide many advantages for humans. Today, the nuclear reactors, applied from various nuclear reactions, can provide usable nuclear

energy

, and it can significantly solve the rising

demand

of

energy

.

Additionally

, nuclear

energy

is now considered carbon-free, and it can handle radioactive substances. To sum up, only by using nuclear

power

for the

demand

of

energy

correctly and wisely can it response sufficient

energy

demand

and reduce pollution, while its

demand

for military should be particularly reduced.