The government should spend more money medical research to protect citizents’health than protecting the environment. Agree or disagree?

It is argued that it is important for the central leader to spend more

money

on medical study to shield citizens’ health than defending the

environment

. In my opinion, I disagree completely with

this

view It is evident that central authorities should spend much

money

on conserving the surroundings.

Firstly

, defending the

environment

brings a huge array of advantages. Because it it a great way to reduce contamination of the

surroundings

Suggestion

surrounding

. Thanks a wide range of campaigns from central authorities

such

as sorting out of daily waste, encouraging the population to use public transports

instead

in driving private cars, leading to decrease a lot of diseases due to environmental pollution.

Moreover

, it helps us spend less

money

on purchasing

medicine

. Because of fresh air and clean

environment which

Accept comma addition

environment, which

creates less ills than environmental contamination I believe that the government spend over fund on medical study to preserve citizens’ health makes several drawbacks. The

first

disadvantage is that people become to depend on

medicine

.

Therefore

, they do not prevent ills due to the sick would be used

medicine

Suggestion

medicinally

medically

to cure.

As a result

, immure systems are extremely weak.

Furthermore

, central leader must pay a number of amount

money

and time consuming on investigating medical treatment.

For example

, in my country, a few decades ago, scientist had to spent three years and 100 billions VND in order to studampicillin

medicine

  In co

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

governments

government's

nclusion, Personally, I totally disagree that The budgets should be invested more on medical study to defend citizens’ health by the goverments

instead

in shielding the

environment