Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There has been much discussion revolving around the issue whether houses should adopt the existing architectural type of a local area. While some people believe newly built houses should be similar to its local ones, others contend that everyone should be free to choose their own technique of house. In

this

essay, I am going to shed some light on both points of views and extend my full support to the latter view. On one side of the argument there are people who argue that there has to be options to choose for everyone.The main reason for believing

this

is that the world we live in is a dynamic world and latest changes in technology make it mandatory to alter the building model. While solar rooftops and rainwater harvesting,

for instance

, were not needed in the 20th century, they have become a necessity in the

first

of the present century.

Moreover

, people follow fashion in building construction and they would be allowed to fulfil their tastes and preferences. Humans prefer living in the spaces to which they can attach their emotions.

For example

, the Japanese people, love living in traditional homes while the Americans live in a home with the latest technology.

Therefore

, it is easy to see why their argument has gained support.

On the other hand

, it is

also

possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that a diversity of designs distorts the uniformity of landscape in a city. Uniformity of houses is aesthetically appealing for everyone. To illustrate, cities like Chandigarh allow the same trend for every house and

this

has become the heritage of the city. More importantly,

this

helps governments serve the people better. An identical design helps fire-fighting services to douse the fire easily since they have an idea of each home’s layout.

Also

,

this

prevents people from designing homes that are not environmentally sustainable. All homes are constructed to meet government’s architectural requirements for reducing the electricity demand and water cycling.

Thus it

Accept comma addition

Thus, it

goes without saying that their viewpoint is credible and realistic To conclude,

this

essay discussed about the variety of houses from different perspectives. In my opinion, both arguments have their merits. On balance, I believe every homeowner should be allowed to build a home to suit his tasted and preferences so that all family members can

love

go away from a place

leave

their abode. Forcing them to construct a government plan will be equivalent to living in a forced enclosure.