Creative artists should always have the freedom to express their ideas (in paintings, books, films, and songs) in any way they wish. The government should not restrict what they do. To what extent do you agree with the opinion?

These days, innovative and creative artists enjoy so much of

freedom

compared to the past and their views and ideas are expressed through several forms

such

as paintings, magazines, movies, video songs, and social media. Personally, I strongly believe that the

government

should control the artists' expression if it affects

certain group

Suggestion

a certain group

of people or their religious beliefs or faith.

This

essay will discuss the aspect of why the

government

should restrict the

freedom

of expression, through the examples from Harvard

Education

Suggestion

Educational

Review research and Oxford University experiments to demonstrate the points.

To begin

with, all artists are generally very expressive, and they

also

enjoy drawing attention through controversial opinions.

Further

, they

also

publish their views through social media

such

as Facebook, Twitter, Instragram and

Youtube

Suggestion

YouTube

video blogs

to reach

Suggestion

reach

widened audience group.

Although

many governments encourage

such

creativity, sometimes these views hurt the religious beliefs or induce racism or even those views could be offensive.

Such

unthoughtful

exhibiting insight or clear and deep perception

insightful

, creative ideas lead to chaotic conditions in several countries, where people indulge in demolishing statues, destroy public and private properties as a response to published opinions, which lead to disastrous economic conditions. Consistent with

this

thought process, Harvard Education Research recently published an article comparing USA with other countries where, the unrestricted

freedom

had led to violence, and increased the

government

expenditure by 5% because of

such

freedom

of speech.

In addition

to

this

, the reach and impact of artists are much higher than ever today.

Hence

, any views expressed in any mode would affect the country's economy on a massive scale.

For example

, if there is no peace in a country, because of

such

views continuously being expressed by the artists, would lead to the deterioration of capital investment from other countries.

Moreover

,

such

implications will have a greater impact in nations GDP growth and

hence

governments should restrict the artists' creativity within certain limits. Consistent with the same line of thinking, Oxford University conducted an experiment with various investors and obtained their views on the characteristics of the countries they would invest which revealed that, more than 70% of the investors have selected the countries where law and order was maintained perfectly. To conclude from the aforementioned views and examples, I firmly believe that the

government

should ensure the

freedom

of thought process within certain boundaries, as

otherwise

, the law and order in any country would be out of control. Most of the nations exercise

such

controls to ensure the security, peace and wellness of people, which is predicted to have a longer impact in the nation's economy and people's life.