Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is believed by some people that financing the arts is frittering away the money and it would be better if the government spent

this

amount somewhere else. I completely disagree with

this

statement because

art

provides us information about our values and past and it generates

revenue

.

Firstly

,

art

is considered as a great way of reflecting cultural values. It reflects the heritage of the country and gives a better understanding of the culture.

For example

, India used

art

to show their dance and their religions. The African

art

is symbolic of their tribal cuffs as seen on their totem poles. It reflects our ever changing culture and has the ability to alter society's values.

Moreover

,

art

brings meaning in people's lives and helps preserve the world's culture and societies.

Secondly

,

art

exhibitions and museums are the sources of generating

revenue

. Many

art

lovers and tourists pay for visiting the

art

galleries and museums,

thus

producing a large amount of fund.

In addition

to that, it increases tourism

revenue

as well.

Furthermore

, that money can be used for the betterment of the nation.

For instance

, the Nike

Art

gallery in Lagos serves not only as an exhibition centre but as a tourist attraction that generates a great deal of

revenue

for the state through exhibitions and entrance fees.

Finally

, in conclusion,

art

remains a vital part of the society. I believe that it is not wasteful spending for governments to fund the arts as it provides insights for traditions and

also

give rise to the money generated.