In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is said that by some people that new modern
railways
Suggestion
railway
systems for high-speed trains should be invested by governments, which links cities
together but
Accept comma addition
together, but
others believe that existing public conveyance should be more priority than others on improving. I argue that both these views have many positive aspects which will be discussed below. On one hand, there are some justifiable reasons why people think that
authorities
Suggestion
the authorities
need construct innovative
railways
Suggestion
railway
lines.
Firstly
, by setting up a traffic infrastructure serves for several modern vehicles
such
as
bullet
Suggestion
a bullet train
the bullet train
train
, the subway
train
and so on, a number of nations will address radically traffic congestion problems.
Secondly
, with developing of very fast
train
model which is supported by advanced technology will attract many people utilizing
this
vehicle because of
convinience
the state of being suitable or opportune
convenience
and quick features of them.
For example
, a bullet
train
called Shinkanse in Japan can run at a speed of 300km/h, meaning that the Japanese may move between two cities separated by 100km in the less one
third
hours.
On the other hand
, I
also
think that a number of
state
Suggestion
states
-officials should spend more money on improving existing public transport system due to several reasons below.
First
, in some countries,
this
system is being used by a great deal of people and it would be difficult for authorities to change their habit
on
Suggestion
of
utilizing current public vehicles, including buses, trains,
etc
continuing in the same way
etc.
,..
Besides
, the cost
for
Suggestion
of
recovering public conveyance is cheaper than
buiding
a structure that has a roof and walls and stands more or less permanently in one place
building
new
railways
Suggestion
railway
lines.
Second
, offering more qualitative road structures may help decline the use of private vehicles, leading to
reducing
Suggestion
reduced
the large amount of CO2 emitted into
atmostphere
Suggestion
the atmosphere
atmosphere
and improving air quality. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the improvement of existing public transport is
necessary but
Accept comma addition
necessary, but
I think that the installation of high-speed railways is
also
important in many nations.
Submitted by Andy on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: