The use of autocorrect software makes it unnecessary for people to know how to spell words correctly these days. Is this a statement that you agree with? To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Technophiles often claim that a competent command of syntax is superfluous owing to the rise of

autocorrect

machines. Meanwhile, it is argued that the ubiquity of spell-checkers is no excuse to cease striving for high standards of literacy. I firmly agree with the latter for the following reasons.

Firstly

, linguistic skill is paramount in every single context. In fact, paper and pen classwork and hand-written exams are inescapable obstacles among students from pre-school to colleges.

Subsequently

, tech-savvy students with the excessive use of

autocorrect

software are likely to put themselves at a disadvantage in standardized tests.

Besides

, dictation undoubtedly plays a crucial role in virtually everyone’s life, ranging from

post-it

Suggestion

Post-it

notes in meetings, reminders for miscalls, and holiday postcards.

Moreover

, with a view to cementing a social bond, hand-written letters are optimal.

Thus

, the replace-as-you-type software may not be worth using at all.

Secondly

,

such

newfangled programs are unlikely to foil our pursuit of precise language, which is fundamentally due to its limitations in recognition of syntax errors.

For example

, green squiggles that plaguing a Word document may harp grammatical goofs

such

as wordiness or use of contractions, yet never once could they identify a dangling participle or incorrect word choice.

Therefore

, students who go thesaurus wild will succumb to some linguistic pitfalls.

Furthermore

, fail-safe devices like auto-correction are unable to fabricate an eloquent and expressive work of writing without the authentic ideas from people with proper lexical control.

Thirdly

, obsession with text replacement programs may result in intellectual decay. Precisely, in the age of

autocorrect

, human beings tend to stop using their brains to their utmost capacity, because there is no need to commit the spelling of words to long-term memory anymore. Were

this

trend to continue, people would end up with a weak vocabulary and even find it challenging to express their thoughts on paper.

Consequently

, people should learn how to spell correctly to maintain their mental efficacy. In conclusion, there is ample evidence to support the notion that the acquisition of grammar and spelling is here to stay, regardless of the technological advances in

autocorrect

. After all, people still have to shoulder the responsibility of proofreading.