Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often believed that the nations with an extra working time are economically stronger as compared to the country with less number of labour hours. As per my point of view, I disagree with the statement and discuss the reason in the below paragraph. To embark on, increased number of labour hour not only reduce the capability of the employee, but

also

the quality of the task.

Moreover it

Accept comma addition

Moreover, it

will affect the health of employees due to long sitting hours. If the person will extend his working hour on daily basis,

then

he will get stressed and suffered from various diseases like obesity and blood pressure which

further

affect their families.

Hence

, it will affect on the leave pool taken by individuals due to the illness which directly affect the output and impact the financial aspects of the company.

Furthermore

, the economy nowadays depends on the latest technology used in the companies

instead

of manpower. If the nation has its latest technology in each and every field,

then

they can get more output as compared to the manual work.

For example

, In a bank, the calculation job to which human will do in 2-3 days would be completed by machine in a few hours or seconds.

Likewise

, a person can do another task side by side,

thus

the productivity improved. Another example of production of baby diapers in the factories. In

this

, the output given by machines for producing the pads is more compared to the manual efforts done by the employees. To conclude with, doing an extra job for an extra hour is not solution of economic success. Despite of all, the smart task with smart technology is the way to become more stronger.