The best way to solve world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel.Do you agree or disagree and give your own opinion.

Some people say that economic

growth

is the only way to end hunger and

poverty

, while others say that economic

growth

is damaging the

environment

so

it

it is

it's

your opinion.

ould

Suggestion

Could

Would

Ould

be stopped. Discuss both views and give Economic development is seemingly achieved at the cost of the

environment

.

This

has led some to propose that governments should halt economic

growth

, but many people posit it as the only panacea for starvation and

poverty

. My stance is that economic advancement is not entirely to blame for environmental problems and that it plays a key role in alleviating world hunger and breaking the vicious circle of

poverty

. Admittedly, there is a preponderance of evidence suggesting how countries thriving economically harm the

environment

.

This

can be seen in the disappearance of natural habitats due to deforestation, the extinction of many animal species due to poaching and hunting and pollution, of various kinds, due to industrial and agricultural waste.

However

,

such

problems are fundamentally caused by maladroit governments that are either unaware of the repercussions of their inaction or condone pernicious human activities because of short-term economic incentives.

In other words

, if governments around the world had striven for economic sustainability and strictly regulated harmful practices, the world's current economic prosperity could still be achieved – albeit it would take longer.

Thus

, it is unnecessary to cease economic

growth

to protect the

environment

. There are

also

compelling reasons to argue that

growth

in global wealth is the only way to eradicate hunger and

poverty

. With regard to the former,

this

problem can be remedied by providing those living in destitute regions with food and shelter, but

this

provision is not financially viable if a country fails to make economic progress.

Furthermore

, a successful economy invariably engenders more job opportunities,

hence

allowing

more economically

Suggestion

most economically

disadvantaged people to feed themselves and their families.

Nevertheless

, the lack of important knowledge areas or job skills confines poor people to a small number of jobs. In order to holistically curb

this

problem, countries have to allocate more capital to education,

for

example in

Accept comma addition

example, in

the form of educational facilities in less well-off

neighborhoods

a surrounding or nearby region

neighbourhoods

and free vocational courses for under-employed and unemployed adults. Again, without sufficient funds,

this

capital allocation is impossible. In conclusion, economic development does not necessarily exclude the protection of the

environment

and vice versa, provided that governments rigorously circumscribe detrimental economic activities. As

such

, the promotion of economic

growth

should be embraced so that serious problems

such

as starvation and

poverty

could be tackled properly.