More and more serious crimes seem to be committed each year. Some think that the death penalty is the best way to deal with this problem while other people think different measures are more likely to be successful. Discuss both options.

There is an ongoing debate about the most effective ways to deal with heinous crimes
such
as murder, torture and rape. Advocates of capital punishment claim it is the most appropriate response, while more liberal-minded experts put forward a range of alternatives. These differing approaches clearly need to be examined. Those who advocate taking the lives of convicted killers and rapists make several points. They remind us that a prisoner who has been put to death can never re-offend.
This
is certainly not true of other forms of punishment. They
also
claim that the death penalty acts as a deterrent: would-be killers decide not to carry out their plans because they fear the consequences. Again,
this
cannot be said of strategies like rehabilitation programmes.
Finally
, proponents suggest that it is far cheaper than other approaches to serious crime
such
as imprisonment or re-education. Opponents of capital
punishment reject
Accept comma addition
punishment, reject
some of these arguments and put forward others. They dispute the assertion that the death penalty is comparatively inexpensive, citing legal cases which have gone on for decades and proved immensely costly.
In addition
, they believe that the prospect of being hanged or electrocuted rarely deters villains and point to findings by psychologists which support
this
view. They often state that using prison is by far the most effective policy and that attempting to rehabilitate inmates so that they can become law-abiding and productive citizens is the only humane way of dealing with horrific crime. In conclusion, it seems fair to say that
this
issue is complex and agreement between victims, lawmakers and criminologists is unlikely. There are vehement-held views on both sides. I would urge governments to carry out extensive research into the effects of different punishments in order to try to reach a definitive understanding of the consequences of these different approaches.
Submitted by trananh.khang159 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: