Many people believe that having a fixed punishment for all crimes is more efficient. What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a fixed punishment?

It is believed that criminals should get a fixed

penalty

for all offence, which will prevent people from committing violence. So, there are multifarious positive and negative sides of

this

statement and I will spread light on both views with examples in the upcoming paragraphs. To commence with, crime has become a burning issue these days due to emerging technology

such

as social media.

Also

, some newspapers and reporters suggest public that a fixed punishment will have some benefits to stop crime in our societies.

For example

, if court aware people about

penalty

after spreading any kinds of violence,

then

youngsters will avoid to opt these habits and our whole world will turn into a safer environment.

Moreover

, the court will have to spend less time to announce the punishment of prisoners

that is

also

benefit for them to save time in

this

hectic life.

Secondly

, one

penalty

for all wrongdoings have some disadvantages too.

For instance

, multifarious crimes are committed in

this

modern era and sometimes people commit offence by mistake or due to mental illness,

then

they are not accepted to be punished with the same

penalty

as they do not consciously.

In addition

, if punishment has been fixed as becoming a long time prisoner,

then

some people do offence to prevent someone's life so if they get the same

penalty

as the real wrongdoer

then

it would be inaccurate. In conclusion, punishing people according to what kind of crime has been committed will protect some innocent individuals from

penalty

. It can be happened in the government's intervening.