Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.

Performing amused activities with infants can enhance their skills better and much artistry rather than reading. In my opinion, I do agree with

this

notion because these games make their cognitive skills strong and can set up a great coordination in their body parts.

To begin

with, practical lessons are quite essential for infants as it emphasizes them to think out of the box. To be more precise, there are certain plays

such

as puzzle games in which a child needs to understand each and every part of the picture while reconstructing them to make it exactly as it is given in the catalogue. For

this

offsprings have to do a brainstorming that cannot be done by reading a book unless children perform it practically.

Similarly

, in other games,

for instance

, riddles, scramble, and crosswords one have to change his perception of thinking to make new words or solve the mystery. These abilities of learning cannot be achieved by taking theoretical knowledge.

Furthermore

, myriad physical activities are beneficial to maintain a balance in a child's body. Simply stating, cricket, tennis, and volleyball are myriad games that are essential to develop an incredible coordination in a body. To exemplify, while playing cricket an adolescent can learn to make an eye and hand coordination because the batsman has to hit a ball in a certain period of time that comes by playing on the ground

instead

of going through a book. To conclude, entertaining plays can make a child's skills better and imaginative, in spite of reading books. I do not but agree because these games can develop their brain and maintain a greater equilibrium in their bodies.