It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn about culture and people, because people can learn from books, films or the internet. Do you agree or disagree?

The popularity of media,

such

as books, movies or the internet, provides comprehensive information about culture and people in different places and

thus

people can learn their interested countries or cities at home

instead

of travelling a long distance to those places. While

this

statement sounds plausible to some extent, I believe that travel cannot be replaced by the media. Imperatively, media is the most convenient and economical way for people to know every corner in the world, especially for those busy employees who are under financial pressure. Without enough time and money, watching films or reading books related to their favourite places can not only satisfy their needs but

also

save their incomes.

Additionally

, a horde of famous museums and historical sites offer online services, rendering people opportunities to appreciate the masterpieces of arts at home rather than go to these sites by an expensive flight. Suffice to note, there is an important reason why people should learn their interested areas by a tour

instead

of through the media. Travelling helps people accumulate personal experiences and broaden their horizons as well. Only by talking with the local people, living in their way of life, experiencing their customs and culture, and tasting the local food, can people understand the place better. It’s these experiences that books and movies cannot replace. By and large, people who are busy and poor could benefit a lot of knowledge provided through the media.

However

, experience acquired from travelling cannot be learnt from a

geographic

Suggestion

geography

book or a fantastic movie and

therefore

I agree that people should visit where they interested in person if they are able to afford the travel expenses and have free time.