It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is an indisputable fact that

history

plays an essential role in the educational system all over the

world

.

However

, children nowadays are getting overwhelmed with a considerable range of historical knowledge; some people, for that reason, believe that students should only focus on local

history

. In my opinion, both local and

world

history

ought to be taught on account of the tremendous benefits they bring.

To begin

with, local

history

is completely a great importance, especially for school children since it is not merely a particular subject at school but the responsibility of every single student

for

Suggestion

in

their own country. To put it another way, through

history

, children are able to establish a national identity which is likely to enhance a sense of patriotism that encourages them to preserve/uphold traditional values. From another angle, learning global bygone times is truly necessary as well. As a matter of fact, the definition of globalization today is becoming more and more popular, studying

world

history

,

therefore

, keeps young learners up to date and indeed gives them more opportunities to get exposed to the outside

world

, which they definitely cannot learn through domestic one.

Besides

,

world

history

also

increases the chances of boosting/improving employment prospects in future career. Take Japanese firms for a typical example, owing to the appreciation of Japanese companies to a deep insight of their culture, it is totally advantageous for employees who acquire a wide knowledge of Japanese

history

. In conclusion, both local

history

and

world

history

are extremely important for students because of their huge pros.

Therefore

, they should be taught widely in the school curriculum.