Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be used better elsewhere. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Part of the population believes that the expenses made by

g

Add an article

the

show examples

overnment in

art

is useless and should be destinated to more important issues.

This

essay totally disagrees with

this

statement because culture represents a field of work which reduces people stress and

also

helps the developments of new artists.

Firstly

, the movement of culture helps people to keep good mental health. It is very common to see people that go to the theatre, museum or even listen to music to release the pressure accumulated from the workweek. The expenses on

art

do not always reflect material compensations.

For example

, a study attended in Brazil has shown that workers who had constant access to

art

were more likely to manage anxiety and stress without the necessity of medication.

Secondly

, the

government

financial support of

art

usually helps to the widespread culture around the community,

therefore

, it results in stimulating the emergence of new artists and ways of

art

. The more someone has contact with

art

the more they will be interested in it and more likely to include that expenditure in his budget.

For instance

, countries which

government

had been constantly supporting and paying musical concerts in

l

Add an article

the

show examples

ast decade had developed more than twice the number of musicians to the world compared to other countries. To summarize, as it was described the

government

spent in

art

is never a waste of resources. That act not only allows people to understand how to deal with stress but

also

increase

art

spread out in the world.