some think that governments should tax unhealthy foods to encourage people to to eat healthier. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Some think that heavy-handed governmental taxation is the only way to compel healthier eating. In my opinion,while
this
makes rational sense, its actual effectiveness is questionable. Those that argue in favour of these taxes can point to a logical chain of suppositions. Though taxes on unhealthy foods are rare ,there is the occasional mandated price hike for sugary drinks and fast food ,smoking is an instructive corollary. Several decades after research showed that smoking causes cancer ,governments are able to push through legislation to tax cigarettes heavily. The result was that those already addicted to smoking continued to smoke but many people did not pick up the habit
Add the comma(s)
,
show examples
to begin
with. Proponents argue
this
would
also
be the case when it comes to foods known to cause cardiovascular disease ,diabetes and cancer .many would eat them despite higher prices but the
next
generation would become more health-conscious and that would
further
trickle down to their children . Though the above arguments are well reasoned, people will stay buy luxuries. There is strong evidence for
this
dating back centuries. After the war of independence from Britain, the newly formed united states instituted direly needed taxes on luxuries included whiskey and chocolate .the purpose of the taxes was to raise money ,not to lower consumption of those products. The unpopular acts were internally vindicated when people continued to buy luxuries along with the same growth trend ,enabling them to increase the national budget. Even though cutting down on purely pleasurable products makes dis disinterested sense, people are more swayed by instant gratification that cold calculation . In conclusion, taxes on unhealthy foods would not be an effective measure against their consumption.
Instead
,governments should invest more in healthy school lunches and making healthy products more widely available to attack the problem at its root source.
Submitted by ougacheourdia890 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: