Some people think it is important to keep and maintain old buildings rather than replacing them with modern buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Owing to the rapid development of modern society, many historical structures have been demolished to make way for new buildings.

However

, some people suggest that it would be more humane and economical if we preserve old buildings. I partly agree with

this

idea. One the one hand, some conventional buildings in the cities shouldn't be torn down because of their high architectural and cultural value.

In other words

, the unique, interesting style of those old buildings can brighten the modern

city

and attract a lot of tourists.

For example

, many mansions with over 200 years of history are still situated in the

city

centre of Shanghai and they have become an iconic part of the

city

.

Moreover

, those buildings diversify the

city

's architecture style by its different features, which have made the

city

a more beautiful place to live. One the other hand, it is noticeable that some dilapidating buildings have failed to meet the safety codes and blocked the way for new businesses.

That is

to say, a large amount of carbon dioxide can be released from those old buildings due to their outdated equipment

such

as the air conditioning system.

Furthermore

, older structures are usually no longer suitable to be used as modern offices and might cause inconvenience for many people on a daily basis. So

this

kind of buildings should be demolished to create a better, safer work environment. In conclusion, old buildings that are historically significant and aesthetically attractive should be preserved.

However

, the

city

planner should replace those dangerous sites to meet the new standard. Personally, I believe we should reuse the old structures with good value and tear down the buildings that are unsafe.