TEENAGERS WHO COMMIT SERIOUS CRIMES, SUCH AS BURGLARY OR MURDER, SHOULD BE TREATED IN THE SAME WAY AS ADULTS WHO COMMIT CRIMES. DISCUSS THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THIS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION?

Crime is increasing day by day. The youngsters who commit heinous crimes
such
as culpable homicide should be treated the same way as other major persons are treated.
This
perspective has lots of advantages and some demerits too.
This
essay will discuss both and support the former statement.
Firstly
,
this
view has some cons. The major drawback is that youngsters get labelled in society because when any minor child commit any serious misconduct, people never trust him in the future and avoid their offsprings to play or accompany him.
This
behaviour leads to anxiety, stress and frustration which gives birth to other crimes.
In other words
, punishments
also
work as a big hindrance to teenager's cognitive development because
this
view sticks to a minor's mind that nobody supports him in future.
This
way, corporate or capital punishments have some disadvantages.
Next
, the other side of
this
view, if every criminal is treated in the same manner, it will bring fear in everyone's mind that committing wrongdoing can ruin their career.
For example
, In the Delhi rape case where a woman was raped by minor boys and brutally killed by them, in that case, if severe actions were not declared against the culprits,
then
it will encourage criminals and crime in society.
Thus
, if the offence is committed
then
punishments should be given unbiased. In my opinion, the accused should be punished without any age limitation because if a minor knows how to do the crime, that means he must know that the consequences of his actions should be worst. In conclusion, I would say adults and minor criminals should be treated equally without any bias.
Submitted by Jyot on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • deterrent effect
  • equality before the law
  • psychological development
  • rehabilitation prospects
  • incarcerating
  • hardened criminals
  • tailoring punitive measures
  • developmental aspects
What to do next:
Look at other essays: