Some people think that you can never become fluent in a language unless you have spent time living or working in that country. To what extent do you agree ?

A language can be fluent, for that it should have been used in routine life.

For instance

, English is the most speaking language and each country has a difference in accent. It's true, some people think unless until you do not stay in a nation , you cannot speak their native linguistics. We can have a discussion, and come up with an ideal solution, neither agree nor disagree to that above point.

Although

most people are fluent in widely speaking linguistic, and provided with an atmosphere to improve, it is far uncomparable to the native speech.

For example

, English is

s

Add an article

the

show examples

econd official language in India, and most population have basic skills, but it's entirely different in accent and tenses used.

First

, even though the non-native speakers lag in their home nation , they can drastically improve, after relocating to the countries like The USA and Australia.

Second

, for improving your vocabulary skills and accent, online classes are largely available.

Thus

people say, it is not mandatory to stay in the home country, to speak their verbal . People

also

argue, if you use the right words and properly place sentences, it will be fair enough to present yourself. But it is

also

a point to argue, after all, completion of your studies, it is cumbersome unless you follow as a routine, and it

also

applies to verbal skills. If you stay in the atmosphere,

then

only you can develop your skills. I would assert, and to conclude the topic of discussion, it is possible to develop your dialectal skills

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but to be competent, you have to spend time living or working in that country.