Some people believe public transport should be free of charge. Do you thing advantages are more than disadvantages?

It is said that public

transport

ought to be free of

cost

. In my perception, the benefits of

this

practice far outweigh its drawbacks because it prevents the atmosphere from toxic gases. Admittedly, there are some drawbacks to

this

trend, one of them is that it increases the burden on the

government

. To elaborate, if public

transport

is offered at no

cost

, certainly, the

government

has to bear a considerable amount of the funds on the operational

cost

such

as, wages to employees who run public buses and trains, fuel charges, and maintenance. In order to cover

such

expenses, the higher authorities might raise the rate of the income tax, which ultimately will be borne by its citizen. Despite its obvious disadvantage, the merit of it far outweighs its drawback as it helps to clean the atmosphere.

This

is because, if public

transport

is made available without any charges, undoubtedly, it allows the general public to switch from their private vehicles that are the great contributor in the global warming, as it releases the harmful toxic gases into the air.

Therefore

, providing free public

transport

can surely decrease the ratio of dangerous gases and clean the climate.

For example

, an article by BBC News revealed that in January 1999 Singapore

government

enabled its citizen to use trains and buses at free of

cost

, and

this

resulted in the air of Singapore 10% fresh as compared to earlier. In conclusion, the

government

has to tolerate a considerable amount of funds if bus or train services are given at free of

cost

. In my view, the benefit far outweighs its drawback, since it prevents the ozone layer from affecting the harmful gases.