While some people think that keeping animals in the case is brutual and should be banned, others opine it is necessary for the conservation of endangered creatures. In my opinion, zoos are significant for the preservation of the wild entity;
however
, both views will be discussed.
On the one hand, the zoo deprives the animals to have natural habitats. Every creature has its own way of surviving, and animals are not beyond that. Usually, they are habituated to live in nature with their homogeneous group by hunting and playing. But, keeping them in the artificial environment makes them bound to limit their innate acts. Linking Words
For instance
, tigers are great predators, but while they are in the zoo, they are bound to eat what they are served, which let them not to exercise their innate power. Despite Linking Words
this
, freedom of living might let many of them lose their life by the hunters.
Linking Words
In contrast
, the zoological garden protects wildlife. Every year many species are hunted by predators in the wild and decreasing abruptly. Many of these creatures have biological and medical significance; Linking Words
therefore
, they are highly required to remain in nature. To ensure their survival in the world, zoos are contributing most by giving them safe shelter, food and suitable atmosphere for breeding. Linking Words
Hence
, the wild museum is not preserving animal life but Linking Words
also
serving them a riskfree survival. Linking Words
For instance
, a survey conducted by Wikipedia published that the number of lions is increased in Bangladesh after creating shadow shelter for them.
In conclusion, Linking Words
although
some people opine zoo should be banned as it is inhuman to forcefully let the animals stay in the case, it is taking the major role to preserve wildlife. So, Linking Words
such
preservation centres should exist in the world.Linking Words
bd_rume