Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?

Nowadays

energy

demand is surging significantly. Despite the detrimental impact on society with regard to the environment, more than 50% of the

energy

requirement is met by fossil-based fuels. It is agreed that nuclear

energy

is a predominant alternative to fulfil the ever-increasing requirement. Advantages of nuclear

energy

and its sophisticated features will prove

this

.

Firstly

, as nuclear

energy

is generated from uranium, it is inexpensive.

For instance

, It costs around $1 to produce 10 watts of

electricity

from a nuclear plant, whereas the same costs $5 to produce from a hydroelectricity plant. Due to

this

, more and more institutions prefer nuclear

energy

than traditional methods. As most of the governments subsidize the

electricity

cost, opting to

this

energy

source is helping them to not only save money but

also

to meet their fiscal deficit targets.

secondly

, unlike conventional

energy

sources,

this

is easy to produce.

For instance

, a recent plant build by japan produces 1000 Megawatts of

electricity

. It requires at least 10 thermal power plants of the same size to produce the same.

Moreover

, the abundance of uranium supply allows the plants to run round the clock.

This

is helping the

electricity

departments to avoid power outages. To summarize,

energy

generation from nuclear

electricity

is not only affordable but

also

effortless to produce.

This

in turn helps to meet the surging demand.

Therefore

, it is agreed that Nuclear

energy

should be used to meet the increasing

energy

demand. After a thorough analysis of

this

subject, it is suggested that governments should give paramount importance to nuclear

energy

.