It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

It is an undeniable fact that

wildlife

is an essential part of any country. It is often said by some people that a huge amount of union budget is being used in

wildlife

preservation, while it should be used on other more crucial problems rather than using it on

wildlife

. Being agree to

this

statement will give my reasoning in the essay below. Whereas

wildlife

is directly linked to the food chain, disruption of

wildlife

will eventually affect the survival of human beings.

Therefore

,

l

Add an article

the

show examples

aw is taking every possible step to save flora and fauna by establishing the

wildlife

sanctuaries and spending a huge budget on its preservation. While it is very important for human survival, there are many other ways which can curb the situation without spending much of money and that curtailed can be used on other more influencing factors.

However

,

Wildlife

can be saved by general awareness among people, by imposing high penalties on not following any laws made by authorities.

For example

, there should be high fines or imprisonment for people who go hunting for the sake of their fun. By doing so people will be more concerned about saving

wildlife

and officials can concentrate on other issues.

In addition

, the other problems that are attracting more concern, are the problems of unemployment and poverty. Due to the problem of unemployment people who do not have a job, to feed their family, get involved in criminal activities which in turn affects the growth of the State.Rather than spending a large extent of money on

wildlife

regime should invest in commercial projects so that people could get employed or the economy of the province could thrive,

For example

, if each and every person would be earning, he would pay tax and that number could be again used for the development of the overall economy. In conclusion, it is true that

wildlife

preservation can not be ignored, but it can be saved with general awareness or some political initiatives and

also

without spending much money, while the other issues can not be solved by the general public and only ministry can invest in these projects so in my opinion power should curtail some volume from

wildlife

projects and invest in other concerning issues.