The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs enormous government expenditure.This money should be used in new housing and road development.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

With the progress and renovation made in civic facilities in modern cities,it follows that an increasing number of historical buildings inevitably need to be restored,which costs a great deal of capital of governments.In
this
case,there are people arguing that the money should be invested in building new houses and roads
instead
.In general,I am in favour of
this
suggestion. Admittedly,the reconditioning of old buildings has proved its cultural and historical worth to some extent.
For instance
, the UK has poured billions into the rebuilding of its castles in the 14 century into museums,which attract vast numbers of visitors nowadays and boost its tourism industry.Undoubtedly,the work on maintenance and upgrading of old ones tends to facilitate the establishment of international reputation for abundant cultural relics as well as a reminder of the past for our future generations.
However
,In a world full of practical problems
such
as traffic jams and compact households,it seems that the government should make more efforts presently to deal with these urgent issues.
First
of all, our newly-built skyscrapers are able to make better use of limited space to hold much more residents than those in old times,which include only a few storeys.
Furthermore
,various highways being built provide huge benefits for the public by saving their commuting time and relieving traffic stress.
Last
,advances in technology and science should be applied in our daily life and promote the modernization of large cities.
Besides
,there are some countries compelled to spend a huge amount of fund on rebuilding vintage houses just because the locals' strong bondage with the past of their families,which seems not wise enough in my personal view. To sum up,I take the view that governments should invest more in the modern development of buildings and road systems,which not only benefit individuals
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
but
also
the country as a whole.As for ancient buildings, it is reasonable to allocate a certain proportion to our cultural heritages in a balanced way.
Submitted by 644439101 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: