The international committee should act immediately to ensure that all countries reduce fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. Do you agree or disagree?

The greater threat for humanity and for all life forms on the earth is global warming caused by human actions. I strongly agree that all countries should closely coordinate to drastically reduce the consumption of fossil fuels since

pollution

in a

country

impacts others and no nation will take initiative due

Add the preposition

to

show examples

the economic impacts of

such

measures. The

pollution

of every

country

impacts the environment of other countries in one way or another. Take

for example

how mineral waste from factories in Chile affects Peruvian underground water reserves. Chilean waste from mining which results from the processing of

cooper

Correct your spelling

copper

show examples

is irresponsibly dumped in the desert.

This

pollution

not only contaminates the local wildlife but

also

other countries. In a similar fashion,

pollution

from Japanese fishing boats impacts the sea bed on the coast of many other countries. Since air and sea cannot be divided by physical borders, they act as a single global system and all countries must act together to reduce the environmental impact of industries.

Moreover

,

this

is an era of competition in which all countries race each other to produce goods at a low cost. Since reducing reliance on crude oil will entail a huge investment in alternative sources of energy, it will increase the price of all manufactured goods and no

country

will take

this

initiative. The

country

which takes initiative will lose a competitive advantage over others. In consequence, all countries should come together on a common platform

such

as the United Nations and pledge to curtail the use of fossil fuels in an organized manner. In conclusion, the future of humanity is at stake and the price of not acting is high. I believe countries must cooperate and impose strict reduction targets on

pollution

.