some people encourage mass immigration and some of them refused Should mass immigration be encouraged?

Throughout human history

Add a comma

,

show examples

people have moved from place to place. Some people travel for economic reasons

such

as

the

Correct your spelling

they

show examples

search for work, while others migrate to join their family members or seek academic achievement. Others, James (2019) noted

m

Add an article

the

show examples

ove to escape conflict, mistreatment and terrorism or human rights violations and as some migrate due to the effects of climate change or other natural disasters and environmental factors. In recent years,

immigration

has increased to developed countries;

this

movement has left remarkable and significant impacts. To illustrate

this

, since World War II, immigrants have formed a large regional

population

that is

comparable with any previous time. Bureau (2016) found that the

number

of externally born individuals is approximately the same as it was at the end of the 19th and 20th centuries

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

when about 15% of the U.S.

population

was born overseas.

Consequently

, it is becoming a fierce debate platform in several major countries and a

number

of studies have been conducted.

Therefore

, two essential stances have been taken by opponents and supporters of

this

controversial

issue

.

Although

the opponents presented the negative effects of

mass

immigration

,

this

essay will offer the positive effects of

mass

immigration

and the fact that immigrants should be encouraged and welcomed across the world.

This

essay will discuss and rebut some arguments on the negative impact of

mass

immigration

on the economic, cultural and social aspects of the

destination

countries. One of the main negative aspects of

immigration

could be unemployment. Marchiori et al., (2018) suggested that a high

number

of researchers mention

destination

countries could suffer from crowding populations.

This

issue

places a burden on countries,

such

as a shortage in career opportunities, pressure on countries' public services, and competition of advantageous works, according to Pais (2013).

In

addition

, Pais stated that the highest productive jobs will be worked by low-skilled immigrants with low wages rather than having those jobs occupied by the expert local

population

,

for example

, some architecture and agricultural engineering. She went on to say that

this

immoral functional exploitation will completely destroy creativity and innovation. It was concluded that widespread poverty and

n

Add an article

the

show examples

eed for welfare in host countries was due to the rising rate of unemployment.

In contrast

, recent studies have indicated that migrants are actually positive contributors to the

economy

. Pais referred to the persuaded fact that foreign-born workers in the U.S.

economy

are set at all levels of the professional hierarchy, including desirable and profitable careers.

Moreover

,

this

issue

could increase prospects of economic growth in the country of origin by a salient channel of monetary remittances that rescue those countries from poverty and might even inspire the creation of small businesses

such

as carpentry, blacksmithing and agriculture. The small businesses could gradually develop and contribute to the booming

economy

of developing countries according to Marchiori et al., (2018).

In

addition

, successful experiences will be transferred and benefit those enterprises in developing countries when manpower returned from overseas to work . These are not the only benefits of

mass

immigration

as there are enormous advantages for those who have been participating in raising the

economy

in developed countries. These advantages, Marchiori et al went on to state could be that taxes are raised from migrants and that they could be working in

low level

Add a hyphen

low-level

show examples

professions which are not

desireable

Correct your spelling

desirable

to the local

population

. As mentioned above

mass

immigration

effectively supports economic growth in both developed and developing countries. The

second

counterargument argues for the loss of culture. Several surveys were conducted to investigate citizens’ acceptance of the idea of

mass

immigration

. Alesina et al., (2018) noted that the results of those studies involved repudiation based on habits and cultural differences. Researchers claim that

mass

immigration

may cause a loss of migrants’ national identity, feeling of belonging to and forgetting their native country’s history. Foner et al. (2018) suggested that

this

history is important for citizens to be proud of their united national identity and to defend it.

In

addition

, the opponents claim that

mass

immigration

causes losses in their mother language, which is a big part of cultural identity. There

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

a high percentage of immigrants who forget their mother language, and

this

is especially the case for the younger generations who were born outside of their home country. Persecution and racism are some examples of prejudice towards immigrants

..

Replace the punctuation

.

...

show examples

They refer to the persecution that occurs when preventing immigrants from enjoying their human rights. With the example of racism, there can be a lack of acceptance of any non-native residents, and

this

has a

number

of different cultural, religious, ethnic and nationality issues that accompany

this

.

Nevertheless

, it can be argued that

mass

immigration

has achieved many great accomplishments. The main achievements are an exchange of understanding of cultural civilizations, traditional arts, values and lifestyles which were taught in public institutions as fundamental material. The major benefit behind

this

is the acquaintance with newcomers' societal culture and the encouragement of citizens to respect and appreciate immigrant civilizations.

Moreover

, obtaining an efficient education and mastering of foreign languages is one of the intended objectives of

mass

immigration

according to Jiang et al., (2019).

In

addition

, Jiang went on to say that the addressing of racism and the enforcing of justice

immigration

administration was established in

destination

countries in order to care for immigrants' rights as native residents. In summary,

mass

immigration

has played an essential role in recognizing various humanities arts and the acquisition of important languages

..

Replace the punctuation

.

...

show examples

Nonetheless

, opponents have argued that a harmful result of

this

issue

might be the rupturing of familial relationships for immigrants. Chernoff et al (2019) explained the impaired familial relationships lead to psychological problems

such

as anxiety, depression, stomach complaints and diseases.

Moreover

, Suárez-Orozco, (2009) concluded that

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

psychological disorders could be harming migrant parents and their children. The emotional stress and confusion might influence security, stability, leading to violence and teenage crimes while immigrant parents' supervision is absent.

However

, technological development is considered a great solution to help immigrant families communicate.

This

will undoubtedly invalidate opponents’ arguments regarding

mass

immigration

and its damage on household relationships and health. Recent studies confirm that permanent communication by technological methods may participate in alleviating migrants' homeland nostalgia. When obtaining a psychological balance, it will encourage migrants to stay at work, which in turn increases the family income and improves the standard of living according to Chernoff et al., (2019). To sum up, despite opponents presenting a negative psychological effect related to the social life of newcomers, supporters have solved

this

problem via technological communication. In conclusion, the

issue

of

mass

immigration

has become a serious

issue

for public debate.

Although

scholars point out the negative and positive impacts of

mass

immigration

, the results of recent studies strongly

favours

Change the verb form

favour

show examples

mass

immigration

because of economic and cultural benefits are unlimited in both the home and

destination

countries. It is

therefore

worth stating that the arguments presented in favour of

immigration

far outweigh those stated against it.