Idividuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a different. To what extent to you agree or disagree. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

An increasing number of people are concerned about environmental issues in recent decades.
However
, some people reckon that authorities and large corporations should shoulder all the responsibilities to tackle the issues, as normal persons can not undertake any action to help with it. In my view, I completely disagree with it for the following reasons.
Firstly
, it is obvious that, for most human beings, there are a substantial amount of actions available to do for improving our living surroundings.
For example
, we could use eco-friendly products in our daily life,
such
as cloth shopping bags and recycled dinnerwares, which will function to cut down the total usage of plastics. And
also
, people could ride bicycles and take public transport
instead
of using private vehicles to reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide.
Therefore
, without governments and companies, individuals can
also
provide their supports to prevent the deterioration of natural surroundings.
Moreover
, small efforts made by individuals can be transferred properly to inspire more people to join the communities and end up with an immeasurable power of human beings to solve environmental problems.
For instance
, Greta Thunberg who is a little girl at primary school, and she understood the need to take action to mitigate the effects on
climate
crises when she was at the age of eight. To spark change, Greta launched the School Strike for
Climate
to encourage students to skip school and demand human beings to take action to reduce carbon footprint and combat the effects of
climate
change. Her
climate
advocacy has led more than one million students around the world to protest
climate
change inaction.
Hence
, even a single person can influence a large number of others to join to take actions on environmental protection, and it can make significant development in the world. It is
also
true that governments and companies play an important role in the process of natural protections. But to ignore the positive contributions of individuals would be biased. There are, of course, plenty of actions can be taken by the authorities to make the difference in nature,
such
as introducing nature protection laws, collecting heavier taxes on unsustainable products and so on.
Additionally
, the corporations may use eco-friendly packaging and recycled materials for manufactures. But still, individuals’ effects and contributions cannot be neglected. In conclusion, even though the powers and large companies are important roles in preventing natural, ordinary people
also
shoulder a part of responsibilities on protecting nature. So I totally disagree with the statement.
Submitted by fanganqi79 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: