Some people think that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while other people argue that it is wrong. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There are contentious heated debates over whether doing experiments on animals for medical purposes is tolerable or not. Before forming any opinions, it is necessary to discuss both perceptions, and I will delve into both approaches in the

next

paragraphs. Advocates for animals medical

research

claim that humans can permit ourselves to conduct experiments on other species because they believe in natural selection. In reality, the law of evolution will eliminate the weak, and the strong will survive. If we allow ourselves to use other animals for

research

to find ways to cure serious illnesses, we can avoid the extinct of humankind.

For example

, to produce the vaccine for the H5N1 virus, many rats or birds died in laboratory experiments;

however

, humans found a way to stop a disease which could have led to the edge of human extinction.

On the other hand

, animals medical

research

also

arouse a great deal of controversy since the opponents state that

this

activity is immoral. From the humanitarian perspective, scientists have no moral right to cause any discomfort or pain on animals, yet it is necessary to do

this

as a way to protect our species. If the ultimate goal is for serious medical purposes,

then

scientists can experiment on animals.

Nevertheless

, if experimentation is only for beauty produces, the practice must be banned entirely. In conclusion, using animals for medical

research

can be justified on a moral basis and under strict conditions. In my opinion, the boundary between what is moral and immoral in using animals for medical

research

is thin, and it is our responsibilities to draw the line and raise red flat towards unnecessary experiments. Not until there is an emergency which causes severe threats to humanity,

then

we can use animals experiences as the

last

option.