ın a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In recent time, many of environmental changes has been occurred in several countries and one of is that public
transportation
models. Nowadays, individuals concern about new
railway
lines’ necessities, some of them believe that for
railway
construction government should spent sum of money while others suggest that money can be expended for currently public
transportation
advance. For my point of the view, fast trains may be contributed to city life in positive way so it may be logical expenditure.
Firstly
, ın the modern world, many of businesspeople have to commute to the remote areas due to visit their costumers and fast train opportunities ensure them time consuming and expand their daily travel scheme.
On the other hand
, contemporary trains have a greater and convenient facilities
such
as internet and restaurants.
Moreover
, particularly in a crowded cities fast trains lead to eliminate traffic congestion.
For instance
, UK citizens have been highly demanding for fast train travelling so people purchase tickets early in the mornings for work to home commuting. Obviously, citizens may not neglect tremendous benefits about fast trains. The other approach, numerous cities have greater regulation of oldest
transportation
which are buses or metros. Indeed, cheaper and efficient
transportation
are being preserved to citizens with the traditional models
therefore
that it is unnecessary to build new
railway
lines. In steed of
railway
contraction taxes may be spent for rearrangement of existing transport system. Feasible advances are: increasing number of line, transform rotes to more preferred ones and renew seats and stations. In consuming age, it may be a valuable influence to citizens. Briefly,
transportation
system is part of daily life
thus
, citizens have to powder that every improvement impress their life competently.
Submitted by natalikristapor on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: