Most high level jobs are done by men. Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women?

Nevertheless

, when it comes to

lifestyle

decision making plays an important role and it can lead to great success. Some people think that governing bodies should make rules to control how people live their lives whereas the counter-argument is that it should be an individual's own decision. I would like to delve into both the views before forming an opinion. The supporters deem that changing

lifestyle

, caused by globalisation is affecting their culture and local administration should set up rules stop

this

corruption of their moral and ethical values.

For example

,many segments of society in India are trying to pressurize the Indian government to set up laws that stop the spread of western culture. In some states,with the help of administration,they have even tried to stop Valentine's Day, interfaith marriages extra. The opposite school of thought is that

lifestyle

plays a vital role in deciding the individuality of a person and any decisions about how one lives his life should be at his own discretion.

Moreover

, the administration taking control of people's life will affect their personal space and put a dent in social harmony as well.

For example

with certain states passing laws to stop interfaith marriages, adult couples who have married willingly in other religion are being harassed by certain radical groups citing the law. According to my point of view,it is a right of an individual to decide how he wants to live his life, and indeed authorities should strengthen laws to protect

this

right of its citizens, rather than making

lifestyle

a subject of the state. In the end, it can be concluded that

lifestyle

is a subject of individuality and it should be left at one's own discretion. Governments should protect

this

right of its citizens to make a prosperous happy society.