The government should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree?

To some people, it would be ideal if the

overnment

Correct your spelling

government

is more focused to facilitate them with more rail tracks than roads. It is agreed, not only it can be an affordable

way

to commute, it can benefit more people.

However

, it can not be the only

way

for transportation. We have to find a balance between both ways of travelling. Rails are more time-efficient and economical.

Additionally

, it is

e

Add an article

an

show examples

nvironment-friendly

way

to move around. A rail is always on time and there

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

less traffic accident with rails; Which makes rails more safe

way

to travel than other sources. Rails would emit less carbon as compared to other vehicles.

Hence

, making it human friendly. Rails can accommodate more passengers which concludes less fuel consumption overall. To

further

elaborate

Verify preposition usage

on

show examples

this

, consider all people using a train travelling on their own vehicles. Rails do not have frequent traffic signals like other vehicles. Which helps people to save their time and passengers would

also

not be tired of driving either. To summarize, rails are cheaper, time-efficient, less exhausting ways to travel, but they have limitation when it comes to railway tracks. we can not have tracks passing through the main city because

this

would affect the

opulation

Correct your spelling

population

badly. Upon arriving and departing of rails there would be noise which affects people.

Moreover

, It is not practical to have rail tracks run through

s

Add an article

the

show examples

treets.