Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do u agree or disagree?

It is true that rich countries usually help poorer ones with some financial support.

However

, I do not believe

this

is the proper solution for

poverty

and rich countries should find another alternative to tackle

this

problem.

This

essay will present arguments to support my opinion. When it comes to

poverty

,

money

is not enough to solve it.

Although

money

is important to help poor countries to develop their nations, it is not the way to solve

such

a problem from its roots.

In other words

, it is necessary for more definitive actions to overcome

this

issue.

For example

, some underdeveloped countries struggle with the administration and giving financial resources without teaching how to use it is a complete waste of

money

.

Therefore

, financial aid has to be given with administration support.

Furthermore

, those underdeveloped countries need some humanitarian aid rather than just

money

. To illustrate, those countries have a weak education system and education is some of the best ways to overcome

poverty

. Considering

this

, richer nations could send teachers to help poor countries to develop a universal and efficient education system.

Nevertheless

,

this

is a long-term solution and it requires adequate planning to reach the final goal, which is to stop

poverty

.

In addition

,

further

actions could be taken to solve other problems,

such

as children death rate. Doctors

also

could be sent to minimize

this

problem. To sum up,

although

financial aid is important to solve

poverty

, developed nations could help other countries in different ways. I believe wealthier nations could

also

help by sending professionals to work alongside the government.