some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. discuss both these views and give your opinion.

There is an argument about how to decrease

traffic

accidents, while some

believe

Replace the word

belief

show examples

in new measures to be more effective than driving offences’ punishments, others see the later is the principle of reducing road problems. From my perspective, we need both together, they are not something to compare. On the one hand,

traffic

rules and fines are essential in controlling driving offences. Harsh punishments are usually the most successful method to control both major and minor crimes. When offences pay al large fine or get their licences revoked for a time, they are going to think more and more before breaking

traffic

restrictions again.

For instance

, when I paid 325 dollars for running a red light, I become more stuck in

traffic

law. SO harsh punishments are indispensable to decrease accidents on roads.

On the other hand

,there are many new methods that can help together with fines in reducing drivers’ mistakes that may threaten

s

Add an article

the

show examples

afety of others.

Such

as increase the road capacity as well as quality to provide more facilities that prove safety.

Besides

, offer educational subject about road’ rights for high schools’ student to prepare them before getting their driving licence.

For example

Add a comma

,

show examples

an hour weekly to learn about safe driving will enhance students awareness with how to respect transport limitations . In conclusion, I can see obviously that both law and rules together with new ways

such

as good road constructions, and educating youngers more about rights of roads, will augment each other in providing safe driving and decrease accidents.