Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarket in some countries, many small, local business are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Numerous characters deem enhancement of supermarket in developed nations is prompting bankrupts to many entrepreneurs and local people in

business

;

in contrast

, certain groups of people oppose and affirm

this

trend affects positively to the public. I reckon the increasing number of supermarkets do not leave a place to minor

business

runners, and

this

phenomenon causes an adverse ramification to the public.

First

of all, small

business

runners and entrepreneurs are regarded as stimulators of their nation's

economy

. Many people run their own

business

, meaning the

economy

will stay vibrant and flourish rapidly, as these people activate the

economy

.

For example

, the USA has the world's strongest

economy

, as it started supporting their individual

business

runners 400 years ago, while many other countries realised

this

trend's virtue only a decades ago.

Thus

, these countries now termed as developing nations and underdeveloped nations, so aiding local

business

runners empowers the

economy

.

Secondly

, there is a high probability these entrepreneurs'

business

and companies to become global corporations enriching their nations'

economy

heavily. Each new

business

runner has a unique idea, so at least 10 new firms among 1000 become well-known companies in their nation.

For instance

, almost all global and most powerful corporations,

such

as Amazon, Facebook, and Apple were invented in the USA, providing support for its new

business

runners.

Hence

, without new start-up companies nations will not advance as if they imagined. In conclusion, from the statements and examples given, I firmly believe that small

business

and innovators are what makes a county industrialize.