In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years, it is suggested that minor people have earned too much heavy wage rather than ordinary citizens. In
this
essay, I will elaborate on two aspects of
this
phenomenon but personally, I agree that the benefits of being rich people's social influence which involved leading to activate demand of the economy.
To begin
with, there is an argument that someones who received plenty of income from their companies or workplaces tend to occur industry progress.
That is
because those wealthy people tend to consume their money
on
Verify preposition usage
in
show examples
various fields.
For example
, most artistic works and masterpieces had
saled
Correct your spelling
saved
sailed
by millionaires, those products which represent the country's
the
Remove the article
apply
show examples
degree of development. Aside from that, without those people's consumption, it is hard to counter attacks by
s
Add an article
the
show examples
low economy.
Therefore
, I am in
favor
Change the spelling
favour
show examples
of that millionaires have brought positive influences in countries.
However
, for a non-discrimination society, some countries argue that governments have to restrict the individual's revenues.
In other words
, they deal importantly with equal property among the public and they believe that
this
revise will reduce the figure of poverty.
For example
, North Korea, the country has clung to the socialism system for citizens' equality for a long time. But, recently, the country's politics are not going well, with most people are poor. More importantly, most people live in the capitalist world.
Hence
, if the government establish new regulation for organizing private's incomes, they need alternatives to reflect the realistic requirements, not relying on the socialism system. In conclusion,
although
earning huge salaries could destroy social equality, it is more likely to have valuable impacts on the countries.
Thus
, it is convincing that the government and relevant organizations should keep
this
situation.
Submitted by kooji6856 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • wealth inequality
  • economic growth
  • motivation
  • talent acquisition
  • consumer spending
  • tax revenue
  • redistributing wealth
  • market forces
  • income disparity
  • social stability
  • freedom of choice
  • meritocracy
What to do next:
Look at other essays: