Some people think art such as sculpture and music cannot improve the quality of people’s lives so the government should not spend money on them but on health and defence. What is your opinion?

21st century has seen numerous technological advancements, most significant are in health and defence. People argue that

art

fund

should go to medical and in the protection of the nation. In my opinion, arts improves mental health and

government

keep a portion for its funding. In

this

essay, the importance of arts and why the

government

should keep funding will be discussed.

To begin

with, it is evident from the past that

art

makes people mentally sound.

Art

like sculptures enhance creativity and give a better understanding of the culture whereas

music

alleviates stress.

For example

, a study of Oxford University, London eludes that by listening to

music

the stress levels go down by 50% in an individual.

Thus

,

art

like statues and

music

improve people’s lives in the mental sense.

On the other hand

, even if the

government

diluted

art

fund

into health and defence, it will have no significant effect on them.

Government

’s

fund

is largely composed of medical and arms for forces and craft is only a tiny bit of the budget.

For instance

, In India’s budget, craft has only 0.1% of the budget which is insignificant for other sectors.

Hence

, the

government

should keep the craft’s

fund

as it is now. In Summary, even though a portion of the population thinks that arts do not enhance the quality of life and its funds should be invested in other sectors. I strongly believe that

music

and sculptures enrich life in many ways. If the craft is kept alive, future generations could have a glimpse of the current lifestyle and conditions which will help improve their understanding of their past and culture.