Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Developed

countries

have always been trying to help other

countries

with poor living conditions through financial help.

However

, many research suggests that financial

aid

is not the best way to tackle

poverty

, I personally disagree that financial

aid

is the best form of help for under-developed

countries

. I believe there are many things that industrialised

countries

can do to help poor

countries

. Financial

aid

can be beneficial for under-develop

countries

when it is used wisely.

This

means the financial

aid

has to go to things that have a direct impact on minimising

poverty

. Unfortunately, the money usually goes to the country's government and it will be hard for the other developed

countries

who are trying to help to track where the fund goes. I think rich

countries

can have more impact on reducing

poverty

issue through a more direct approach.

For example

, I know an organisation in Australia who help children in Indonesia by building schools to help them have access to education because they are living in a remote area.

Furthermore

, I see a lot of organisations who are helping by sending food supplies, building water resources and funding teams around the world to tackle the human trade problem. These kinds of help definitely have a bigger impact on solving the

poverty

issue, since developed

countries

give under-developed

countries

access to their people's needs. In conclusion, I personally think financial

aid

can provide some help for under-developed

countries

.

However

,

this

can only be achieved through proper funding, but

this

can be difficult to achieve.

Therefore

, rich

countries

must think of a better way to help.