Some people believe that it is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to a horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Many
cities
today are expanding upwards to accommodate surging urban populations. In my opinion,
this
can help preserve nearby land for other uses and is a better solution than encouraging urban sprawl. Some would argue that tall
cities
present challenges for inhabitants and a spread-out
city
offers a better quality of life. Condensed urban areas with lots of tall apartment blocks, like in New York
City
or Shanghai, are famously difficult to live in due to the effects of overcrowding on sanitation, safety, and traffic conditions.
In contrast
, decentralised
cities
like Los Angeles and Nashville allow for the development of unique individual neighbourhoods, more space for residential construction and a reduction of the urban issues listed above. Individuals living in these
cities
often report greater feelings of satisfaction and many ‘transplants’ move to
such
cities
because of the better living standards.
However
, those in favour of taller buildings can logically point out the resultant benefits for the area around a
city
. It is often hard to check the growth of economically important
cities
and that can lead to massive urban sprawl, as is in the case around Mexico
City
and Tokyo. By building more skyscrapers, the surrounding area can be preserved or used in another way. Pristine natural lands can be designated as national parks. If the
city
requires more food to feed its population, there could be proximately located farms with fast delivery times.
This
surplus land could
also
be turned into quiet suburban towns to give residents the choice of raising a family outside the
city
and still earning a good wage and having easy access to the cultural benefits of large metropolises. In conclusion, horizontal
cities
facilitate some positive living conditions but taller
cities
make more sense in the modern world. It is,
nonetheless
, important to strike a balance and mitigate the issues caused by growing urban populations with quality infrastructure.
Submitted by laplaseo9007 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: