It is often argued that authorities should levy a tariff on
foods to reduce the health regarding hassles in the individuals. From my point of view,
approach is negative due to the drawbacks which have been in human life because
helps those who are busy in their life due to hectic schedule, as well as foodstuff, plays a vital role to strengthen the economy of any particular nation.
with, As everyone is very busy in their life due to a hectic schedule, so they do not have enough time to cook their daily meal.
food helps them.
, it approaches health problems.
, Everyone has their own choice in
, anyone has no right to implement rules on their meal preference.
, it is beneficial for poor people
Change the pronoun
It appears that the pronoun who may be used incorrectly. Consider changing it.
do they have sufficient money to cook their meals, so, they can easily resolve their hungry problem as
feed easily available at very cheap prices.
, a survey was conducted by The Newyork Times showed that 70%
Verify preposition usage
It appears that there is a missing preposition after the word %. Consider adding the preposition.
people of America choose a prepackaged feed to resolve hunger
Correct your spelling
The word duo doesn’t seem to fit this context. Consider replacing it with a different one.
to busy schedules.
why the government ought not to apply the tax.
, The other positive thing behind
phenomenon is that as fast cuisine plays a very significant role in the economy of the countries. As authorities get high revenue from them,
, the management uses
money to other fields of the nation's development.
, an Economic Times newspaper showed through there survey that 20% of the wealth of Singapore running from
, levy a tariff is not a good decision.
there are some negative elements, I strongly believe that positive sides do outweigh the negative ones. It is a better way for individuals to fulfil their hunger in these busy days and
it helps to the strong economy of nations.